Meeting intelligence · Court order
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas, Amarillo Division
Research subject: North Plains Groundwater Conservation District. research subject
order filed date
Date context: Source/event dates retain their roles; no signature or acquisition date substituted for approval. Non-meeting documents have no district meeting date.
Source-linked research summary. Verify important details against the official source record.
Source summary
ECF 90 denies the District counterclaims partial-summary-judgment motion and dismisses without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction, declining supplemental jurisdiction after prior dismissal of BLF claims. It does not award penalties or decide the disputed authority to assess them. Missing ECF 78 charts remain missing; no exact $211,940,000 demand is stated in this opinion.
Source evidence · physical p. 1, physical p. 2, physical p. 4, physical p. 5, physical p. 6, physical p. 7
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
Source and dates
- order filed date
- 2025-05-23
- Document approval date
- Unknown / not stated
- Routing metadata date
- Unknown
- Extraction date
- 2026-09-26T17:53:28.033339+00:00
- Last official source check
- 2026-09-26T05:33:18.625262+00:00
- Source document
- 7 physical PDF pages · north-plains-blf-chain01-72e3193a55c6
Source date roles and qualifications
2025-05-23 · order filed date — As printed in original; not a current-status observation.
Source evidence · physical p. 1
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
Posting, filing, signature, approval, study and referenced dates retain their own roles. They do not automatically conflict with the meeting date.
PDF page fragments are navigation hints; some viewers may open at the beginning.
Source identity: sha256:72e3193a55c6e94414a551f422c577b81c55fd12b1b623b04d69d8e40592ab86
Source completeness
all physical pages read; limitations disclosed in unresolved; not a current-status determination
- issuer
- U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas, Amarillo Division
- source publisher
- U.S. Government Publishing Office / GovInfo
- District role
- research subject
- source acquired at
- 2026-09-26T05:33:18.625262+00:00
- source checked at
- 2026-09-26T05:33:18.625262+00:00
- source check basis
- Copied acquisition metadata; no network/source check during this reading.
Explore Entities and timelines · Dated mentions, without assumed identity merges.
Matters, observations and decisions
Requests, recommendations and approvals retain their recorded labels. A passed motion is a procedural result; conditions are requirements, not proof of fulfillment. Repeated quantities are not added together.
motion cycle
requested relief
Link to this item- topic
- motion cycle
- stage
- requested relief
- statement
- District ECF 77 filed January 31, 2025; BLF response ECF 80 February 21; reply ECF 84 March 14. District seeks rule-violation ruling, civil penalties, injunction and attorney fees/costs, not relief awarded by this opinion.
- Date context
- Document/item context only, not proof that referenced events occurred on this date. Source/event dates retain their roles; no signature or acquisition date substituted for approval. Non-meeting documents have no district meeting date.
- Document / item context date
- 2025-05-23
- attributed referenced date
- 2025-01-31 — Date described in this item, not a conflicting document date or independent instrument. (physical p. 1)
- attributed referenced date
- 2025-02-21 — Date described in this item, not a conflicting document date or independent instrument. (physical p. 1)
- attributed referenced date
- 2025-03-14 — Date described in this item, not a conflicting document date or independent instrument. (physical p. 1)
Source evidence · physical p. 1, physical p. 2, physical p. 3, physical p. 4
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
history
court description of prior events
Link to this item- topic
- history
- stage
- court description of prior events
- statement
- Court describes May 19, 2021 notice for 2020, June 24, 2021 variance request, May 2022 notice for 2021, January 17, 2023 Order 023-001 denial and June 2023 notices for 2022; July 27, 2023 $500,000 demand refused, then BLF suit and district answer/counterclaims ECF 26.
- Date context
- Document/item context only, not proof that referenced events occurred on this date. Source/event dates retain their roles; no signature or acquisition date substituted for approval. Non-meeting documents have no district meeting date.
- Document / item context date
- 2025-05-23
- attributed referenced date
- 2021-05-19 — Date described in this item, not a conflicting document date or independent instrument. (physical p. 2)
- attributed referenced date
- 2021-06-24 — Date described in this item, not a conflicting document date or independent instrument. (physical p. 2)
- attributed referenced date
- 2023-01-17 — Date described in this item, not a conflicting document date or independent instrument. (physical p. 2)
- attributed referenced date
- 2023-07-27 — Date described in this item, not a conflicting document date or independent instrument. (physical p. 2)
Source evidence · physical p. 2
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
prior merits
court description of prior disposition
Link to this item- topic
- prior merits
- stage
- court description of prior disposition
- statement
- This later opinion states the prior summary-judgment opinion dismissed all BLF claims, including federal claims, leaving only district state-law counterclaims. This is the later court characterization, not a reconstructed missing follow-up order.
- Date context
- Document/item context only, not proof that referenced events occurred on this date. Source/event dates retain their roles; no signature or acquisition date substituted for approval. Non-meeting documents have no district meeting date.
- Document / item context date
- 2025-05-23
Source evidence · physical p. 2, physical p. 4
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
penalty chart
court description of requested penalties
Link to this item- topic
- penalty chart
- stage
- court description of requested penalties
- statement
- ECF 78 pp12–20 described as nearly ten pages of potential civil-penalty calculations: GPU number, acreage, annual allowable production, actual subject-year production, excess acre-feet and percent over AAPL. No chart values or total awarded appear here.
- Date context
- Document/item context only, not proof that referenced events occurred on this date. Source/event dates retain their roles; no signature or acquisition date substituted for approval. Non-meeting documents have no district meeting date.
- Document / item context date
- 2025-05-23
Source evidence · physical p. 5, physical p. 6
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
authority dispute
unresolved legal question in order
Link to this item- topic
- authority dispute
- stage
- unresolved legal question in order
- statement
- BLF argues Water Code authorizes district, not court, to assess penalties; district argues it lacks clear independent authority and courts must assess. Court identifies complex/unclear state law and declines jurisdiction; it does not resolve the authority contest.
- Date context
- Document/item context only, not proof that referenced events occurred on this date. Source/event dates retain their roles; no signature or acquisition date substituted for approval. Non-meeting documents have no district meeting date.
- Document / item context date
- 2025-05-23
Source evidence · physical p. 6
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
disposition
court order
Link to this item- topic
- disposition
- stage
- court order
- statement
- Court declines supplemental jurisdiction over remaining state-law counterclaims, DENIES ECF 77 and DISMISSES case without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. District must pursue state-law claims in state court if it wishes to continue. No later filing, recovery or appellate result established.
- Date context
- Document/item context only, not proof that referenced events occurred on this date. Source/event dates retain their roles; no signature or acquisition date substituted for approval. Non-meeting documents have no district meeting date.
- Document / item context date
- 2025-05-23
Source evidence · physical p. 4, physical p. 5, physical p. 6, physical p. 7
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
Quantities, roles and time bases · 1 values
Quantities, roles and time bases
Requested, recommended, historic, modeled and approved values retain their separate roles. A null time basis does not remove a time dimension already present in the unit.
Rule-violation resolution · court-described refused demand; not judgment
Link to this item- subject
- Rule-violation resolution
- role
- court-described refused demand; not judgment
- value
- 500,000
- unit
- USD
- time basis
- Unknown / not stated
- Date context
- Document/item context only, not proof that referenced events occurred on this date. Source/event dates retain their roles; no signature or acquisition date substituted for approval. Non-meeting documents have no district meeting date.
- Document / item context date
- 2023-07-27
Statement basis: court-described refused demand; not judgment
Source evidence · physical p. 2
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
Wells, permits and water-domain objects
2:23-CV-133-Z
Link to this item- type
- litigation
- label
- 2:23-CV-133-Z
- trial court
- U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas, Amarillo Division
- Date context
- Document/item context only, not proof that referenced events occurred on this date. Source/event dates retain their roles; no signature or acquisition date substituted for approval. Non-meeting documents have no district meeting date.
- Document / item context date
- 2025-05-23
Statement basis: source-linked item
Source evidence · physical p. 1
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
Unresolved questions
No subsequent state court filing, appeal disposition, mandate, collected sum or current compliance outcome supplied.
Source evidence · physical p. 7
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
Named entities and meeting-local relationships
Names remain as stated in each source. Similar names across meetings are not merged. Candidate relationships remain hypotheses.
BLF Land, LLC
Link to this item- name
- BLF Land, LLC
- type
- organization
- roles 1
- plaintiff
- roles 2
- counter-defendant
- identity scope
- source-local; no corporate identity merge
- Date context
- Document/item context only, not proof that referenced events occurred on this date. Source/event dates retain their roles; no signature or acquisition date substituted for approval. Non-meeting documents have no district meeting date.
- Document / item context date
- 2025-05-23
Statement basis: source-local; no corporate identity merge
Source evidence · physical p. 1
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
Blaine Larsen Farms, Inc.
Link to this item- name
- Blaine Larsen Farms, Inc.
- type
- organization
- roles 1
- plaintiff
- roles 2
- counter-defendant
- identity scope
- source-local; no corporate identity merge
- Date context
- Document/item context only, not proof that referenced events occurred on this date. Source/event dates retain their roles; no signature or acquisition date substituted for approval. Non-meeting documents have no district meeting date.
- Document / item context date
- 2025-05-23
Statement basis: source-local; no corporate identity merge
Source evidence · physical p. 1
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
North Plains Groundwater Conservation District
Link to this item- name
- North Plains Groundwater Conservation District
- type
- organization
- roles 1
- defendant
- roles 2
- counter-plaintiff
- identity scope
- source-local; no corporate identity merge
- Date context
- Document/item context only, not proof that referenced events occurred on this date. Source/event dates retain their roles; no signature or acquisition date substituted for approval. Non-meeting documents have no district meeting date.
- Document / item context date
- 2025-05-23
Statement basis: source-local; no corporate identity merge
Source evidence · physical p. 1
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
Matthew J. Kacsmaryk
Link to this item- name
- Matthew J. Kacsmaryk
- type
- person
- roles 1
- U.S. District Judge
- identity scope
- source-local; no corporate identity merge
- Date context
- Document/item context only, not proof that referenced events occurred on this date. Source/event dates retain their roles; no signature or acquisition date substituted for approval. Non-meeting documents have no district meeting date.
- Document / item context date
- 2025-05-23
Statement basis: source-local; no corporate identity merge
Source evidence · physical p. 7
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
Unavailable referenced material
Unavailable reference
Link to this item- description
- ECF 1, 17/26 pleadings, ECF 77/78 motion/brief, response 80, reply 84, Order 023-001 and notices/exhibits referenced but not complete supplied instruments. ECF 78 is not verified as source of the commenter exact total.
- Date context
- Document/item context only, not proof that referenced events occurred on this date. Source/event dates retain their roles; no signature or acquisition date substituted for approval. Non-meeting documents have no district meeting date.
- Document / item context date
- 2025-05-23
Statement basis: source-linked item
Source evidence · physical p. 1, physical p. 2, physical p. 4, physical p. 5, physical p. 6
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.