Meeting intelligence · Court order
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas, Amarillo Division
Research subject: North Plains Groundwater Conservation District. research subject
order filed date
Date context: Source/event dates retain their roles; no signature or acquisition date substituted for approval. Non-meeting documents have no district meeting date.
Source-linked research summary. Verify important details against the official source record.
Source summary
ECF 67 denies plaintiffs partial-summary-judgment motion and grants the district cross-motion, rejecting takings, procedural/substantive due-process and equal-protection claims. It finds GPU regulation within statutory authority but includes a 14-day, 10-page supplemental-brief procedure before finalizing sua sponte ultra vires relief. Court-described invoices, settlement demand, party acreage claims and modeled drawdown retain distinct roles.
Source evidence · physical p. 1, physical p. 3, physical p. 18, physical p. 22, physical p. 26, physical p. 27, physical p. 28
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
Source and dates
- order filed date
- 2024-11-13
- Document approval date
- Unknown / not stated
- Routing metadata date
- Unknown
- Extraction date
- 2026-09-26T17:53:28.033339+00:00
- Last official source check
- 2026-09-26T05:33:17.450909+00:00
- Source document
- 28 physical PDF pages · north-plains-blf-chain01-dc0d2f279c8e
Source date roles and qualifications
2024-11-13 · order filed date — As printed in original; not a current-status observation.
Source evidence · physical p. 1
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
Posting, filing, signature, approval, study and referenced dates retain their own roles. They do not automatically conflict with the meeting date.
PDF page fragments are navigation hints; some viewers may open at the beginning.
Source identity: sha256:dc0d2f279c8e498f71eab5fdc35da1fe84441c1b0816fa383c3c4d3b7028255c
Source completeness
all physical pages read; limitations disclosed in unresolved; not a current-status determination
- issuer
- U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas, Amarillo Division
- source publisher
- U.S. Government Publishing Office / GovInfo
- District role
- research subject
- source acquired at
- 2026-09-26T05:33:17.450909+00:00
- source checked at
- 2026-09-26T05:33:17.450909+00:00
- source check basis
- Copied acquisition metadata; no network/source check during this reading.
Explore Entities and timelines · Dated mentions, without assumed identity merges.
Matters, observations and decisions
Requests, recommendations and approvals retain their recorded labels. A passed motion is a procedural result; conditions are requirements, not proof of fulfillment. Repeated quantities are not added together.
history
court description of prior events
Link to this item- topic
- history
- stage
- court description of prior events
- statement
- Court reports 2020–2022 overproduction, May 19, 2021 notice for 2020, June 24, 2021 variance request, May 2022 notice for 2021, January 17, 2023 Order 023-001 denial, June 2023 notices for 2022, $1,793,461.50 invoices and refused July 27, 2023 $500,000 demand. These are court accounts of record material, not new awards.
- Date context
- Document/item context only, not proof that referenced events occurred on this date. Source/event dates retain their roles; no signature or acquisition date substituted for approval. Non-meeting documents have no district meeting date.
- Document / item context date
- 2024-11-13
- attributed referenced date
- 2021-05-19 — Date described in this item, not a conflicting document date or independent instrument. (physical p. 2)
- attributed referenced date
- 2021-06-24 — Date described in this item, not a conflicting document date or independent instrument. (physical p. 2)
- attributed referenced date
- 2023-01-17 — Date described in this item, not a conflicting document date or independent instrument. (physical p. 2)
- attributed referenced date
- 2023-07-27 — Date described in this item, not a conflicting document date or independent instrument. (physical p. 2)
Source evidence · physical p. 2, physical p. 3
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
evidence rulings
court ruling
Link to this item- topic
- evidence rulings
- stage
- court ruling
- statement
- Warlick affidavit struck for deficient disclosure/authentication of exhibits/data and prejudice. Thornhill affidavit admitted despite late explanation because District adequately responded and suffered no prejudice. Admission is not adoption of his drainage opinion.
- Date context
- Document/item context only, not proof that referenced events occurred on this date. Source/event dates retain their roles; no signature or acquisition date substituted for approval. Non-meeting documents have no district meeting date.
- Document / item context date
- 2024-11-13
Source evidence · physical p. 4, physical p. 5, physical p. 6, physical p. 7
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
takings disposition
court ruling
Link to this item- topic
- takings disposition
- stage
- court ruling
- statement
- Per se and regulatory takings claims fail on the summary-judgment record. Court finds no demonstrated abnormal drainage, insufficient economic impact, no interference with investment-backed expectations, and public harm-prevention purposes. Plaintiffs asserted acreage arithmetic and five-well-area drainage concerns are not approved pumping allocations.
- Date context
- Document/item context only, not proof that referenced events occurred on this date. Source/event dates retain their roles; no signature or acquisition date substituted for approval. Non-meeting documents have no district meeting date.
- Document / item context date
- 2024-11-13
Source evidence · physical p. 8, physical p. 9, physical p. 10, physical p. 11, physical p. 12, physical p. 13, physical p. 14, physical p. 15, physical p. 16, physical p. 17
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
model
court characterization of expert model
Link to this item- topic
- model
- stage
- court characterization of expert model
- statement
- Court describes Wade Oliver model of additional pumping above 1.5 acre-feet/acre on one historically overproduced GPU: up to 30 feet additional drawdown over DFC timeline 2018–2080, all other conditions static. It treats that evidence as uncontested for the statutory-purpose issue. This is not a measured drawdown or all-GPU prediction.
- date status
- Years 2018 through 2080 stated; endpoints not exact dates
- model period
- 2018 through 2080
- Date context
- Document/item context only, not proof that referenced events occurred on this date. Source/event dates retain their roles; no signature or acquisition date substituted for approval. Non-meeting documents have no district meeting date. Years 2018 through 2080 stated; endpoints not exact dates 2018 through 2080
- Document / item context date
- 2024-11-13
Source evidence · physical p. 18
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
ultra vires
court reasoning with conditional procedure
Link to this item- topic
- ultra vires
- stage
- court reasoning with conditional procedure
- statement
- Court holds Water Code 36.116 authorizes GPU tract definitions and production controls. Although text says it is granting district relief, the court affords plaintiffs a supplemental brief of no more than 10 pages within 14 days after filing; absent response it will grant judgment, and with response it will grant/deny or order reply. Preserve conditional procedure; response/follow-up order not supplied.
- Date context
- Document/item context only, not proof that referenced events occurred on this date. Source/event dates retain their roles; no signature or acquisition date substituted for approval. Non-meeting documents have no district meeting date.
- Document / item context date
- 2024-11-13
Source evidence · physical p. 17, physical p. 18, physical p. 19, physical p. 20, physical p. 21, physical p. 22, physical p. 28
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
hearing history
court description of prior process
Link to this item- topic
- hearing history
- stage
- court description of prior process
- statement
- Court describes counsel June 29, 2021 verified request, November 29, 2022 notice, December 9 written-comment deadline, December 2 publication and December 13 hearing, including Leven/Thornhill and Travis Taylor testimony; identifies January 17, 2023 order. Page 3 instead describes a June 24 variance request; roles/attributions retained.
- Date context
- Document/item context only, not proof that referenced events occurred on this date. Source/event dates retain their roles; no signature or acquisition date substituted for approval. Non-meeting documents have no district meeting date.
- Document / item context date
- 2024-11-13
- attributed referenced date
- 2021-06-29 — Date described in this item, not a conflicting document date or independent instrument. (physical p. 23)
- attributed referenced date
- 2022-11-29 — Date described in this item, not a conflicting document date or independent instrument. (physical p. 23)
- attributed referenced date
- 2022-12-09 — Date described in this item, not a conflicting document date or independent instrument. (physical p. 23)
- attributed referenced date
- 2022-12-02 — Date described in this item, not a conflicting document date or independent instrument. (physical p. 23)
- attributed referenced date
- 2022-12-13 — Date described in this item, not a conflicting document date or independent instrument. (physical p. 23)
- attributed referenced date
- 2023-01-17 — Date described in this item, not a conflicting document date or independent instrument. (physical p. 23)
Source evidence · physical p. 23, physical p. 24, physical p. 25
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
due process
court ruling
Link to this item- topic
- due process
- stage
- court ruling
- statement
- District prevails on procedural and substantive due process: court finds meaningful hearing process and rational statutory-purpose basis, and no conscience-shocking infringement.
- Date context
- Document/item context only, not proof that referenced events occurred on this date. Source/event dates retain their roles; no signature or acquisition date substituted for approval. Non-meeting documents have no district meeting date.
- Document / item context date
- 2024-11-13
Source evidence · physical p. 23, physical p. 24, physical p. 25, physical p. 26
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
equal protection
court ruling
Link to this item- topic
- equal protection
- stage
- court ruling
- statement
- District granted summary judgment: large landowners not a suspect class as asserted; with Warlick excluded, plaintiffs present no other evidence of differential treatment of similarly situated landowners.
- Date context
- Document/item context only, not proof that referenced events occurred on this date. Source/event dates retain their roles; no signature or acquisition date substituted for approval. Non-meeting documents have no district meeting date.
- Document / item context date
- 2024-11-13
Source evidence · physical p. 26, physical p. 27
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
disposition
court order
Link to this item- topic
- disposition
- stage
- court order
- statement
- Plaintiffs ECF 54 denied; District ECF 56 granted; separate conditional ultra vires procedure retained.
- Date context
- Document/item context only, not proof that referenced events occurred on this date. Source/event dates retain their roles; no signature or acquisition date substituted for approval. Non-meeting documents have no district meeting date.
- Document / item context date
- 2024-11-13
Source evidence · physical p. 1, physical p. 28
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
Quantities, roles and time bases · 18 values
Quantities, roles and time bases
Requested, recommended, historic, modeled and approved values retain their separate roles. A null time basis does not remove a time dimension already present in the unit.
GPU size · court-described rule maximum
Link to this item- subject
- GPU size
- role
- court-described rule maximum
- value
- 1,600
- unit
- acres
- time basis
- Unknown / not stated
- Date context
- Document/item context only, not proof that referenced events occurred on this date. Source/event dates retain their roles; no signature or acquisition date substituted for approval. Non-meeting documents have no district meeting date.
- Document / item context date
- 2024-11-13
Statement basis: court-described rule maximum
Source evidence · physical p. 2
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
GPU diagonal corners · court-described rule maximum
Link to this item- subject
- GPU diagonal corners
- role
- court-described rule maximum
- value
- 25,000
- unit
- feet
- time basis
- Unknown / not stated
- Date context
- Document/item context only, not proof that referenced events occurred on this date. Source/event dates retain their roles; no signature or acquisition date substituted for approval. Non-meeting documents have no district meeting date.
- Document / item context date
- 2024-11-13
Statement basis: court-described rule maximum
Source evidence · physical p. 2
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
GPU production · court-described allowable annual production
Link to this item- subject
- GPU production
- role
- court-described allowable annual production
- value
- 1.5
- unit
- acre-feet per acre
- time basis
- annual
- Date context
- Document/item context only, not proof that referenced events occurred on this date. Source/event dates retain their roles; no signature or acquisition date substituted for approval. Non-meeting documents have no district meeting date.
- Document / item context date
- 2024-11-13
Statement basis: court-described allowable annual production
Source evidence · physical p. 2
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
2020–2022 overproduction violations · court-described invoices total; not award
Link to this item- subject
- 2020–2022 overproduction violations
- role
- court-described invoices total; not award
- value
- 1,793,461.5
- unit
- USD
- time basis
- 2020–2022
- Date context
- Document/item context only, not proof that referenced events occurred on this date. Source/event dates retain their roles; no signature or acquisition date substituted for approval. Non-meeting documents have no district meeting date.
- Document / item context date
- 2024-11-13
Statement basis: court-described invoices total; not award
Source evidence · physical p. 3
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
Negotiated rule-violation resolution · court-described refused demand; not award
Link to this item- subject
- Negotiated rule-violation resolution
- role
- court-described refused demand; not award
- value
- 500,000
- unit
- USD
- time basis
- Unknown / not stated
- Date context
- Document/item context only, not proof that referenced events occurred on this date. Source/event dates retain their roles; no signature or acquisition date substituted for approval. Non-meeting documents have no district meeting date.
- Document / item context date
- 2023-07-27
Statement basis: court-described refused demand; not award
Source evidence · physical p. 3
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
Plaintiffs controlled groundwater rights · plaintiffs claim quoted by court
Link to this item- subject
- Plaintiffs controlled groundwater rights
- role
- plaintiffs claim quoted by court
- value
- 67,155.07
- unit
- acres
- time basis
- Unknown / not stated
- Date context
- Document/item context only, not proof that referenced events occurred on this date. Source/event dates retain their roles; no signature or acquisition date substituted for approval. Non-meeting documents have no district meeting date.
- Document / item context date
- 2024-11-13
Statement basis: plaintiffs claim quoted by court
Source evidence · physical p. 9
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
Plaintiffs aggregate fair share · plaintiffs calculation rejected as entitlement
Link to this item- subject
- Plaintiffs aggregate fair share
- role
- plaintiffs calculation rejected as entitlement
- value
- 100,732.6
- unit
- acre-feet
- time basis
- per year
- aggregation warning
- Not a board authorization; cannot override per-GPU limits.
- Date context
- Document/item context only, not proof that referenced events occurred on this date. Source/event dates retain their roles; no signature or acquisition date substituted for approval. Non-meeting documents have no district meeting date.
- Document / item context date
- 2024-11-13
Statement basis: plaintiffs calculation rejected as entitlement
Source evidence · physical p. 9
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
Most productive GPUs · plaintiffs claim context
Link to this item- subject
- Most productive GPUs
- role
- plaintiffs claim context
- value
- 5
- unit
- GPUs
- time basis
- Unknown / not stated
- Date context
- Document/item context only, not proof that referenced events occurred on this date. Source/event dates retain their roles; no signature or acquisition date substituted for approval. Non-meeting documents have no district meeting date.
- Document / item context date
- 2024-11-13
Statement basis: plaintiffs claim context
Source evidence · physical p. 11
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
Growing season · plaintiffs claim context
Link to this item- subject
- Growing season
- role
- plaintiffs claim context
- value
- 130
- unit
- days
- time basis
- Unknown / not stated
- Date context
- Document/item context only, not proof that referenced events occurred on this date. Source/event dates retain their roles; no signature or acquisition date substituted for approval. Non-meeting documents have no district meeting date.
- Document / item context date
- 2024-11-13
Statement basis: plaintiffs claim context
Source evidence · physical p. 11
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
Plaintiffs appraisal without rules · appraisal scenario
Link to this item- subject
- Plaintiffs appraisal without rules
- role
- appraisal scenario
- value
- 196,000,000
- unit
- USD
- time basis
- Unknown / not stated
- Date context
- Document/item context only, not proof that referenced events occurred on this date. Source/event dates retain their roles; no signature or acquisition date substituted for approval. Non-meeting documents have no district meeting date.
- Document / item context date
- 2024-11-13
Statement basis: appraisal scenario
Source evidence · physical p. 14
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
Plaintiffs appraisal with rules · appraisal scenario
Link to this item- subject
- Plaintiffs appraisal with rules
- role
- appraisal scenario
- value
- 180,000,000
- unit
- USD
- time basis
- Unknown / not stated
- Date context
- Document/item context only, not proof that referenced events occurred on this date. Source/event dates retain their roles; no signature or acquisition date substituted for approval. Non-meeting documents have no district meeting date.
- Document / item context date
- 2024-11-13
Statement basis: appraisal scenario
Source evidence · physical p. 14
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
Plaintiffs appraisal diminution · court-stated rounded reduction
Link to this item- subject
- Plaintiffs appraisal diminution
- role
- court-stated rounded reduction
- value
- 9
- unit
- percent
- time basis
- Unknown / not stated
- approximate
- true
- Date context
- Document/item context only, not proof that referenced events occurred on this date. Source/event dates retain their roles; no signature or acquisition date substituted for approval. Non-meeting documents have no district meeting date.
- Document / item context date
- 2024-11-13
Statement basis: court-stated rounded reduction
Source evidence · physical p. 15
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
District appraisal without rules · appraisal scenario
Link to this item- subject
- District appraisal without rules
- role
- appraisal scenario
- value
- 224,180,000
- unit
- USD
- time basis
- Unknown / not stated
- Date context
- Document/item context only, not proof that referenced events occurred on this date. Source/event dates retain their roles; no signature or acquisition date substituted for approval. Non-meeting documents have no district meeting date.
- Document / item context date
- 2024-11-13
Statement basis: appraisal scenario
Source evidence · physical p. 15
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
District appraisal with rules · appraisal scenario
Link to this item- subject
- District appraisal with rules
- role
- appraisal scenario
- value
- 219,880,000
- unit
- USD
- time basis
- Unknown / not stated
- Date context
- Document/item context only, not proof that referenced events occurred on this date. Source/event dates retain their roles; no signature or acquisition date substituted for approval. Non-meeting documents have no district meeting date.
- Document / item context date
- 2024-11-13
Statement basis: appraisal scenario
Source evidence · physical p. 15
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
District appraisal diminution · district approximation
Link to this item- subject
- District appraisal diminution
- role
- district approximation
- value
- 2
- unit
- percent
- time basis
- Unknown / not stated
- approximate
- true
- Date context
- Document/item context only, not proof that referenced events occurred on this date. Source/event dates retain their roles; no signature or acquisition date substituted for approval. Non-meeting documents have no district meeting date.
- Document / item context date
- 2024-11-13
Statement basis: district approximation
Source evidence · physical p. 15
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
One historically overproduced GPU · modeled additional drawdown
Link to this item- subject
- One historically overproduced GPU
- role
- modeled additional drawdown
- value
- 30
- unit
- feet
- time basis
- 2018 through 2080
- comparator
- up to
- model
- true
- observed
- false
- allocation scope
- one GPU not identified by number here
- source text
- with all other conditions static
- Date context
- Document/item context only, not proof that referenced events occurred on this date. Source/event dates retain their roles; no signature or acquisition date substituted for approval. Non-meeting documents have no district meeting date.
- Document / item context date
- 2024-11-13
Statement basis: modeled additional drawdown
Source evidence · physical p. 18
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
Ultra vires supplemental brief · court procedural maximum
Link to this item- subject
- Ultra vires supplemental brief
- role
- court procedural maximum
- value
- 10
- unit
- pages
- time basis
- Unknown / not stated
- Date context
- Document/item context only, not proof that referenced events occurred on this date. Source/event dates retain their roles; no signature or acquisition date substituted for approval. Non-meeting documents have no district meeting date.
- Document / item context date
- 2024-11-13
Statement basis: court procedural maximum
Source evidence · physical p. 22
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
Supplemental response period · court conditional procedure
Link to this item- subject
- Supplemental response period
- role
- court conditional procedure
- value
- 14
- unit
- days
- time basis
- after this order is filed
- Date context
- Document/item context only, not proof that referenced events occurred on this date. Source/event dates retain their roles; no signature or acquisition date substituted for approval. Non-meeting documents have no district meeting date.
- Document / item context date
- 2024-11-13
Statement basis: court conditional procedure
Source evidence · physical p. 22
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
Structured tables and transcriptions
Signs, units, nulls and ordered rows are retained. Notes distinguish printed source tables from structured transcriptions of prose or lists. Source evidence applies to each whole table; row links do not assert a more precise page location.
Court-described competing appraisals
appraisal scenarios
Structured transcription of prose, not printed grid; rounded percentages preserved, not recomputed; not awards.
2024-11-13 · order filed date. Document/item context only, not proof that referenced events occurred on this date. Source/event dates retain their roles; no signature or acquisition date substituted for approval. Non-meeting documents have no district meeting date.
Link to this table| Row link | Attribution | Without rules USD | With rules USD | Reduction percent as stated |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Plaintiffs appraisal | 196,000,000 | 180,000,000 | 9 |
| 2 | District appraisal | 224,180,000 | 219,880,000 | 2 |
Table-level evidence for all rows below.
Source evidence · physical p. 14, physical p. 15
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
Wells, permits and water-domain objects
2:23-CV-133-Z
Link to this item- type
- litigation
- label
- 2:23-CV-133-Z
- trial court
- U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas, Amarillo Division
- Date context
- Document/item context only, not proof that referenced events occurred on this date. Source/event dates retain their roles; no signature or acquisition date substituted for approval. Non-meeting documents have no district meeting date.
- Document / item context date
- 2024-11-13
Statement basis: source-linked item
Source evidence · physical p. 1
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
Ogallala Aquifer
Link to this item- type
- aquifer
- label
- Ogallala Aquifer
- Date context
- Document/item context only, not proof that referenced events occurred on this date. Source/event dates retain their roles; no signature or acquisition date substituted for approval. Non-meeting documents have no district meeting date.
- Document / item context date
- 2024-11-13
Statement basis: source-linked item
Source evidence · physical p. 2
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
NPGCD Board Order No. 023-001
Link to this item- type
- administrative order
- label
- NPGCD Board Order No. 023-001
- context
- Court describes January 17, 2023 denial; complete underlying order absent.
- Date context
- Document/item context only, not proof that referenced events occurred on this date. Source/event dates retain their roles; no signature or acquisition date substituted for approval. Non-meeting documents have no district meeting date.
- Document / item context date
- 2024-11-13
Statement basis: source-linked item
Source evidence · physical p. 3, physical p. 24
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
Unresolved questions
Page 3 gives June 24, 2021 variance request; page 23 describes counsel June 29, 2021 request. Preserve separate descriptions, not a silently resolved date.
Source evidence · physical p. 3, physical p. 23
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
Page 10 introduces the right-to-exclude argument as the District arguing, then attributes it to Plaintiffs/ECF 55. Preserve this wording ambiguity. Ultra vires present-tense grant coexists with future conditional procedure.
Source evidence · physical p. 10, physical p. 22, physical p. 28
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
Named entities and meeting-local relationships
Names remain as stated in each source. Similar names across meetings are not merged. Candidate relationships remain hypotheses.
BLF Land, LLC
Link to this item- name
- BLF Land, LLC
- type
- organization
- roles 1
- plaintiff
- identity scope
- source-local; no corporate identity merge
- Date context
- Document/item context only, not proof that referenced events occurred on this date. Source/event dates retain their roles; no signature or acquisition date substituted for approval. Non-meeting documents have no district meeting date.
- Document / item context date
- 2024-11-13
Statement basis: source-local; no corporate identity merge
Source evidence · physical p. 1
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
Blaine Larsen Farms, Inc.
Link to this item- name
- Blaine Larsen Farms, Inc.
- type
- organization
- roles 1
- plaintiff
- identity scope
- source-local; no corporate identity merge
- Date context
- Document/item context only, not proof that referenced events occurred on this date. Source/event dates retain their roles; no signature or acquisition date substituted for approval. Non-meeting documents have no district meeting date.
- Document / item context date
- 2024-11-13
Statement basis: source-local; no corporate identity merge
Source evidence · physical p. 1
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
North Plains Groundwater Conservation District
Link to this item- name
- North Plains Groundwater Conservation District
- type
- government
- roles 1
- defendant
- identity scope
- source-local; no corporate identity merge
- Date context
- Document/item context only, not proof that referenced events occurred on this date. Source/event dates retain their roles; no signature or acquisition date substituted for approval. Non-meeting documents have no district meeting date.
- Document / item context date
- 2024-11-13
Statement basis: source-local; no corporate identity merge
Source evidence · physical p. 1
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
Amber Warlick
Link to this item- name
- Amber Warlick
- type
- person
- roles 1
- plaintiff visualization expert; affidavit excluded
- identity scope
- source-local; no corporate identity merge
- Date context
- Document/item context only, not proof that referenced events occurred on this date. Source/event dates retain their roles; no signature or acquisition date substituted for approval. Non-meeting documents have no district meeting date.
- Document / item context date
- 2024-11-13
Statement basis: source-local; no corporate identity merge
Source evidence · physical p. 4
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
Fearless Eye, Inc.
Link to this item- name
- Fearless Eye, Inc.
- type
- organization
- roles 1
- Warlick firm
- identity scope
- source-local; no corporate identity merge
- Date context
- Document/item context only, not proof that referenced events occurred on this date. Source/event dates retain their roles; no signature or acquisition date substituted for approval. Non-meeting documents have no district meeting date.
- Document / item context date
- 2024-11-13
Statement basis: source-local; no corporate identity merge
Source evidence · physical p. 4
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
Michael Thornhill
Link to this item- name
- Michael Thornhill
- type
- person
- roles 1
- plaintiff hydrogeological expert; affidavit admitted
- identity scope
- source-local; no corporate identity merge
- Date context
- Document/item context only, not proof that referenced events occurred on this date. Source/event dates retain their roles; no signature or acquisition date substituted for approval. Non-meeting documents have no district meeting date.
- Document / item context date
- 2024-11-13
Statement basis: source-local; no corporate identity merge
Source evidence · physical p. 4
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
Wade Oliver
Link to this item- name
- Wade Oliver
- type
- person
- roles 1
- district hydrological expert
- identity scope
- source-local; no corporate identity merge
- Date context
- Document/item context only, not proof that referenced events occurred on this date. Source/event dates retain their roles; no signature or acquisition date substituted for approval. Non-meeting documents have no district meeting date.
- Document / item context date
- 2024-11-13
Statement basis: source-local; no corporate identity merge
Source evidence · physical p. 18
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
Sprouse Shrader Smith
Link to this item- name
- Sprouse Shrader Smith
- type
- organization
- roles 1
- plaintiffs law firm
- identity scope
- source-local; no corporate identity merge
- Date context
- Document/item context only, not proof that referenced events occurred on this date. Source/event dates retain their roles; no signature or acquisition date substituted for approval. Non-meeting documents have no district meeting date.
- Document / item context date
- 2024-11-13
Statement basis: source-local; no corporate identity merge
Source evidence · physical p. 5
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
Sabrine Leven
Link to this item- name
- Sabrine Leven
- type
- person
- roles 1
- GPU consultant; witness as printed
- identity scope
- source-local; no corporate identity merge
- Date context
- Document/item context only, not proof that referenced events occurred on this date. Source/event dates retain their roles; no signature or acquisition date substituted for approval. Non-meeting documents have no district meeting date.
- Document / item context date
- 2024-11-13
Statement basis: source-local; no corporate identity merge
Source evidence · physical p. 24
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
Travis Taylor
Link to this item- name
- Travis Taylor
- type
- person
- roles 1
- local farmer witness
- identity scope
- source-local; no corporate identity merge
- Date context
- Document/item context only, not proof that referenced events occurred on this date. Source/event dates retain their roles; no signature or acquisition date substituted for approval. Non-meeting documents have no district meeting date.
- Document / item context date
- 2024-11-13
Statement basis: source-local; no corporate identity merge
Source evidence · physical p. 24
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
Matthew J. Kacsmaryk
Link to this item- name
- Matthew J. Kacsmaryk
- type
- person
- roles 1
- U.S. District Judge
- identity scope
- source-local; no corporate identity merge
- Date context
- Document/item context only, not proof that referenced events occurred on this date. Source/event dates retain their roles; no signature or acquisition date substituted for approval. Non-meeting documents have no district meeting date.
- Document / item context date
- 2024-11-13
Statement basis: source-local; no corporate identity merge
Source evidence · physical p. 28
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
BLF Land, LLC and Blaine Larsen Farms, Inc. · collectively called BLF in opinion
Link to this item- subject
- BLF Land, LLC and Blaine Larsen Farms, Inc.
- predicate
- collectively called BLF in opinion
- object
- plaintiffs
- identity scope
- explicit within this original
- caution
- Collective label does not merge corporate identity.
- Date context
- Document/item context only, not proof that referenced events occurred on this date. Source/event dates retain their roles; no signature or acquisition date substituted for approval. Non-meeting documents have no district meeting date.
- Document / item context date
- 2024-11-13
Statement basis: explicit within this original
Source evidence · physical p. 1
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
Unavailable referenced material
Unavailable reference
Link to this item- description
- Pleadings, Order 023-001, notices/invoices, ECF 55/58 exhibits, Warlick/Thornhill/Oliver full reports, appraisals and ultra vires supplemental response/follow-up order absent.
- Date context
- Document/item context only, not proof that referenced events occurred on this date. Source/event dates retain their roles; no signature or acquisition date substituted for approval. Non-meeting documents have no district meeting date.
- Document / item context date
- 2024-11-13
Statement basis: source-linked item
Source evidence · physical p. 3, physical p. 4, physical p. 5, physical p. 7, physical p. 18, physical p. 22, physical p. 24
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.
PDF page reference · no quotation or image-method claim
Physical PDF page reference supplied with the extraction; no exact quotation or per-page image method is asserted.