Texas Water SourcesIndependent source navigation
Menu
Free Property ReportOfficial sourcesTREC 61-0 GuideWell recordsGroundwater districtsSurface-water rightsMethodologyContactFeedbackAbout

Texas Water Watch

Entities and timelines

Follow named organizations, people, permits and wells through the records in this collection.

These are dated mentions and recorded actions. A notice is not an approval, a public comment is not a court finding, and similar names do not establish identity. Separate systems and uncertain matches stay separate.

Download entity mentionsDownload candidate research leadsData access and field guide

Find a dated mention

Loading the source-linked mention index…

Candidate research leads

18 supplied leads suggest further investigation. Prior-corpus index matches are navigation candidates, not independent corroboration. No identities have been merged.

Aqua Texas across districts

Possible linkage only

Supply-well applications in Northern Trinity and drought/enforcement reporting in Barton Springs–Edwards may support a utility portfolio timeline.

Aqua WSC in Lost Pines is a separate name; it is not merged into Aqua Texas.

Next verification: Match legal entity, PWS/system IDs and individual permits before linking. Retain five unmapped overpumping percentages.

Find these mentions

Prior-corpus candidates

Earlier extraction-index matches only; no independent corroboration.

The Retreat utility names and well continuity

Possible linkage only

Prairielands explicitly connects several company names to the same well matter; Barton Springs–Edwards reports a Monarch-named permittee.

Repeated names or related topics do not establish identical legal entities, projects, permits or wells.

Next verification: Obtain corporate succession/permit-transfer records and PWS identifiers; do not infer that Monarch’s BSEACD system is The Retreat.

Find these mentions

BLF compliance and federal litigation

Possible linkage only

Repeated GPUs, reporting years and litigation caption can support a longitudinal compliance chronology.

Repeated names or related topics do not establish identical legal entities, projects, permits or wells.

Next verification: Verify caption/docket variants, GPU ownership and which violations each order or settlement resolves. Do not treat public-comment alleged demands as court awards.

Find these mentions

Prior-corpus candidates

Earlier extraction-index matches only; no independent corroboration.

Fort Stockton Holdings and Cockrell litigation

Possible linkage only

Five reported cases and permit cutback monitoring are durable linkage anchors.

Repeated names or related topics do not establish identical legal entities, projects, permits or wells.

Next verification: Match exact dockets, permits and monitoring wells across older records; obtain later court dispositions separately.

Find these mentions

Prior-corpus candidates

Earlier extraction-index matches only; no independent corroboration.

Lane Cockrell

Possible linkage only

Exact person name occurs in a prior BSEACD extraction as well as Southwestern Travis minutes.

Do not join Lane Cockrell to Cockrell Investment Partners merely because the surname matches.

Next verification: Verify person identity and role dates from the prior source before joining records.

Find these mentions

Prior-corpus candidates

Earlier extraction-index matches only; no independent corroboration.

Greg Ellis across district counsel records

Possible linkage only

Same counsel name appears in Lost Pines, Brazoria and prior Gonzales extractions.

Repeated names or related topics do not establish identical legal entities, projects, permits or wells.

Next verification: Verify full identity/firm and role dates; same counsel is not evidence that districts share permit decisions.

Find these mentions

Prior-corpus candidates

Earlier extraction-index matches only; no independent corroboration.

Dirk Aaron district roles

Possible linkage only

Name appears as Wintergarden interim GM and Clearwater GM in differently dated documents.

Repeated names or related topics do not establish identical legal entities, projects, permits or wells.

Next verification: Verify identity and employment chronology; do not infer simultaneous positions.

Find these mentions

Vince Clause and Freese & Nichols technical work

Possible linkage only

Technical consultant names recur across DFC, local aquifer and management-plan work.

Repeated names or related topics do not establish identical legal entities, projects, permits or wells.

Next verification: Match dated report titles and authors; do not treat distinct projects as one contract.

Find these mentions

Prior-corpus candidates

Earlier extraction-index matches only; no independent corroboration.

Cole Ruiz

Possible linkage only

Name appears as Southwestern Travis counsel and a Middle Pecos attendee.

Repeated names or related topics do not establish identical legal entities, projects, permits or wells.

Next verification: Verify full person/firm identity and represented client for each meeting.

Find these mentions

GMA 9 DFC cycle

Possible linkage only

Documents may cover stages in one regional planning cycle, while local meetings have different procedural roles.

Repeated names or related topics do not establish identical legal entities, projects, permits or wells.

Next verification: Obtain common scenario/report identifiers and final adoption; do not equate an agenda, a proposed DFC and a final district decision.

Find these mentions

GMA 13 and Wintergarden planning

Possible linkage only

Regional drawdown schedules and Webb County modeling desires are potential planning links; Evergreen’s rule notice is related context only.

Repeated names or related topics do not establish identical legal entities, projects, permits or wells.

Next verification: Match actual planning documents and decision dates. Do not infer Evergreen rule changes implement the GMA 13 scenario.

Find these mentions

Gonzales monitoring-well series

Possible linkage only

Durable monitoring IDs and January 2013/2026 levels offer potential longitudinal comparisons.

Repeated names or related topics do not establish identical legal entities, projects, permits or wells.

Next verification: Match exact well IDs, datums and periods in the existing Gonzales records; retain source arithmetic conflicts.

Find these mentions

Longfellow/Allison and Gaptank

Possible linkage only

Well-report tracking number and interpreted screened formation are stronger future anchors than project name alone.

Repeated names or related topics do not establish identical legal entities, projects, permits or wells.

Next verification: Match original completion log, coordinates and neighboring wells; distinguish consultant local-aquifer recommendation from adopted classification.

Find these mentions

Diamond Y / Rustler BGPZ / RUS3

Possible linkage only

Dated technical references and six monitoring IDs connect hydrochemistry, recharge, fault hypotheses and proposed brackish-zone changes.

Repeated names or related topics do not establish identical legal entities, projects, permits or wells.

Next verification: Retrieve full referenced reports and TWDB action; confirm aquifer completions and hydrograph datum before linking measurements.

Find these mentions

Clancy / Mirasol alternate supply

Possible linkage only

Minutes explicitly discuss the named project during an abated SOAH case and alternate-supply consideration.

Repeated names or related topics do not establish identical legal entities, projects, permits or wells.

Next verification: Match docket, applicant and PUA project records; verify whether alternate supply was later approved without assuming it from this report.

Find these mentions

Ledgestone entities and three wells

Possible linkage only

Three separate applicants and a common development context are explicit; hearing follows this meeting.

Repeated names or related topics do not establish identical legal entities, projects, permits or wells.

Next verification: Match each application/well ID and April 22 hearing outcome; keep applicants separate.

Find these mentions

Upper Trinity system IDs

Possible linkage only

System IDs support future linkage to continued hearings and prior allocations.

Repeated names or related topics do not establish identical legal entities, projects, permits or wells.

Next verification: Locate June 11/May 21 and later decisions; preserve requested versus recommended quantities and zero-additional replacement volume.

Find these mentions

Hays Commons land-application permit

Possible linkage only

Exact TCEQ permit/application identifier anchors later regulatory and karst-survey material.

Repeated names or related topics do not establish identical legal entities, projects, permits or wells.

Next verification: Verify Executive Director and SOAH documents and survey conditions; do not equate site-survey permission with permit approval.

Find these mentions